Are we forgetting aesthetics in product design?

Product developers and designers bring new, exciting products to the market faster than ever before. However, the preoccupation with ‘new’ – technologies, materials, product categories – often comes at the cost of a poorer aesthetic appeal. But it shouldn’t – and it doesn’t have to.

Good product design is about functionality and form. But just as beautiful design doesn’t make a great product by itself, a one-sided pursuit for new functionality will often lead to missed opportunities – and, according to Henrik Jeppesen, Founding Partner at Attention, an inferior product:

“We’re seeing a massive focus on user experience, and that’s a good thing. Ironically, though, it’s often condensed to functional capabilities, more or less disregarding the visual and tactile experience inherent in any product design.”

Individual taste –  a real thing or just an excuse?

With more than 25 years of experience in industrial design – from consumer products to industrial machinery – Henrik Jeppesen has discussed the value of better design countless times. And one of the recurring concepts he meets is the notion of ‘individual taste’.

“Individual taste is just that: Individual”, Henrik says. “You can’t claim to make informed design decisions based on individual taste – unless you’re developing the product for yourself or another specific individual. Of course, you can design for specific markets or audiences with different preferences. But then you base your design on research that is at least somewhat objective, instead of basing it on subjective taste”.

Baha-5-Sound-Processor_close_up_bw

 

In Henrik Jeppesen’s experience, the reference to ‘taste’ is sometimes based on a misconception of what good product design is about. In other cases, it seems more like a bad excuse to not really put an effort into better design. Either way, it leads to inferior products – and, ultimately, missed opportunities.

Don’t reduce design to an add-on

According to Henrik Jeppesen, there’s also a tendency for some product developers to get caught up in some kind of ‘anti-design’ logic: “The reasoning sometimes seems to be that spending resources on creating a more aesthetically appealing design makes the product less honest – as if to hide flawed functionality”.

Shorter product life cycles and more frequent updates are also commonly used to argue that it’s not viable to allocate substantial resources for developing compelling product designs. But that’s just as flawed as the anti-design logic, Henrik Jeppesen explains:

“Both examples suggest that the aesthetic appeal of a product is basically an add-on to the actual product. And that kind of thinking is probably one of the biggest obstacles if your goal is to develop great products.

To avoid that fallacy as a product developer, it’s necessary to treat design and visual appeal as an integrated part of the product development process: “If you don’t address aesthetics from early on, it’ll always appear like an add-on – and an added cost”, Henrik Jeppesen concludes.

 

Did you enjoy this article?
Sign up for our monthly newsletter and get more knowledge and inspiration for better, faster product development in your company.

3 Comments

  1. Designpiger & drenge,
    Tak for endnu en flot update over bl.a. emnet “Better business with better aesthetics”.
    Jeg bliver altid inspireret af jeres news – noget jeg giver videre til mine kunder, der typisk behøver
    hjælp til at opstarte eller bliver bedre udenlandske markeder.
    Noget der irriterer mig (fortid i bl.a. ECCO & LEGO) er Danfoss nyeste termostater. Dem betragter
    jeg som designmæssigt mindreværdige. Så det helt tydeligt under et nyligt besøg i “museumsafdelingen”
    af Danfoss Universe. Helt uforståeligt med den indflydelse på mange områder
    den store virksomhed har i ind- og udland!
    Er jeg den eneste der har det sådan??

    Med venlig (design)hilsen
    Dethlef N. Burgwald

    1. Kære Dethlef Burgwald,

      Tak for din kommentar. Det er altid motiverende at høre andre dele vores engagement – og ikke mindst, når vi kan være med til at inspirere til det. Heldigvis sker der en masse for at fremme fokus på bedre og smukkere produkter, og lad os se om ikke fx Danish Design Award her til foråret får sat det lidt på dagsordenen.

      Venlig hilsen
      Morten Buch

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s